| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

Search the digital library catalog Help

Query: search in
search in
search in
search in
* old and bologna study programme

Options:
  Reset


1 - 1 / 1
First pagePrevious page1Next pageLast page
1.
The imperative of revising the arbitration exception in the Brussels I bis Regulation
Martina Tičić, 2025, original scientific article

Abstract: Arbitration represents a popular alternative dispute resolution mechanism in the European Union (EU). However, the coexistence of arbitration and court litigation in the EU legal area has been proven to be quite difficult to regulate. At the EU level, the Brussels I bis Regulation, i.e., the main instrument governing jurisdiction and recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters, explicitly states that arbitration does not fall under its scope. This ‘arbitration exception’ has led to difficulties in practice, many of which have found their way to the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU). However, as the CJEU case law shows, it only led to new questions. As these issues will keep emerging, a different solution must be found. The perfect moment for such change is now, as the reform of the Brussels I bis Regulation is ongoing. This paper thus presents the intricacies of the ‘thorny’ interplay of arbitration and court litigation in the EU. In order to remedy the existing problems in practice, two potential solutions are suggested.
Keywords: arbitration exception, Brussels I bis Regulation, arbitration, EU civil procedure, private international law, court litigation
Published in DKUM: 02.10.2025; Views: 0; Downloads: 5
.pdf Full text (547,61 KB)
This document has many files! More...
This document is also a collection of 1 document!

Search done in 0.01 sec.
Back to top
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica